Must read books!

  • Advice for Young Conductors - Weingartner
  • Anatomy of the Orchestra - Del Mar
  • Brigade de Cuisine - John McPhee
  • Heat - Bill Buford
  • Poetics of Music - Stravinsky
  • Tao Te Ching - Lao Tse
  • The Composer's Advocate - Leinsdorf
  • The Modern Conductor, 7th Edition - Green/Gibson
  • The Score, The Orchestra and The Conductor - Gustav Meier
  • Zen in the Art of Archery - Herrigel

Saturday, December 19, 2015

The Kurt Stops Here

Dear Readers,

We lost another giant.  Mo. Masur has passed on, at the age of 88, due to complications from Parkinson's disease.  My reminiscences are not really important, though what I learned from him, especially during the summer of 1986 at Tanglewood, was unforgettable and invaluable.  Parkinson's is a cruel affliction, among the world's most inexorable death sentences.  Yet I will remember Mo. Masur not for that struggle, but for his performances, especially of Brahms, which moved me away from the Szell paradigm to a warmer, more generous approach, and his teaching, which was equally generous and ever insightful.  Yet, I also remember him telling us how he wouldn't do Symphonie Fantastique, because he considered it dishonest.  Then two days later, he conducted Liszt's Dante Symphony.  Oh well, chacun à son gout.   We will celebrate his memory with our Salome performance in January, the last German work we will perform this year.   And I will do my best to pass on what he taught, to continue the chain, maintain the legacy, as we pursue the cause of art to which he dedicated his life.  Requiescat in pace. - MG

A few newer rules of the road

Dear Readers,

Waiting for my ride to the airport in Beijing.  Escaping just in time; a new 4-day red alert was posted, as the air turns foul yet again.  Below please find a post begun while we were preparing Elgar earlier this fall.  I like the ideas, and it never hurts to be reminded every now and then of what may seem obvious, but at times gets lost in the process.  For your edification:

It was a solid, productive sectional, and now I was girding my loins for a crucial rehearsal in a few minutes.  While working with the strings and wind/brass/perc separately, I was reminded of several basics:
1)  We (the conductor) don't rehearse for ourselves.  We rehearse for the orchestra, to help them play as well as they can.  The strings needed the chance yesterday to hear the Elgar 1 without all the extra notes and noise, to see where they double each other (2nd's and violas, violas and cellos, 1st's and violas, etc) and to hear how their harmonies line up with each other.  Also, there are just some nasty licks, and it is better to take care of that stuff with W/B/P waiting a few feet away.

2)  PANIC is never a good motivation or practice/rehearsal method.  Practice reduces panic.  As I like to say, practice doesn't make perfect, but it does make BETTER.  And that is a fundamental truth of rehearsal; it should sound better at the end than it did at the start.

3)  Controversial though it may sound to some readers, it is NOT, in my view, the conductor's job to fix intonation in winds and brass.  The conductor may choose to do so, at his/her own risk, but in my view, in a professional setting, the last thing orchestral wind players want to hear from the podium is that they are out of tune.  Either they already know it, and would fix it with a gentle (off-the-podium) reminder, or they don't, in which case, as we say here, "Get a new orchestra."  Seriously, one of our mantras is "A great orchestra takes care of its own business."  This is different from working with a high school band, or an ensemble of non-majors, where often it is the conductor's job either to fix pitch, to teach about how to fix pitch, or both.  The Philharmonia wind/brass sections know that intonation is above all about LISTENING and AWARENESS.  All I needed to do was to remind the musicians (perhaps more forcefully than I would have liked) of the protocols for intonation.  They responded immediately, and well.

4)  ORCHESTRA MEMBERS: STOP THE FOOT-TAPPING.  Please.  Now.  For the sake of your insoles, if for nothing else.  Those who tap their feet while playing aren't tapping in tempo, either in yours nor frankly even in theirs.  Where it came from, I don't know, but I'm putting it up there with my crusade to "CURE PODIUM DEAFNESS."

5)  CONDUCTORS:  Less beating, more listening.  I've said this 1000 times over - the bigger your gesture, the less you will listen.  And active listening trumps active beating every time.

There you have it, friends.  Next post will be stateside.  Best wishes to all for the holidays! - MG

Saturday, December 12, 2015

"TALK SHOW II" - the sequel!

TALK SHOW II

Interviewer:     So, Maestro, what have you been up to since we last met?
Maestro:         Thanks Bob, it’s great to be back.  We’re working on something really exciting at the symphony right now.
Interviewer:     What’s that, Maestro?
Maestro:         Well, we’re trying to connect with the next generation, a whole new demographic, you know.  Get them to go to our concerts.
Interviewer:     And you have a new idea?
Maestro:         Sports.  And music.
Interviewer:     So how does that work?
Maestro:         Three words, Bob, just three words.  LeBron James.
Interviewer:     I’m afraid I don’t get it, Maestro. 
Maestro:         LeBron James!
Interviewer:     But what would he do with your orchestra?

Maestro:         Does it really matter, Bob?

"TALK SHOW" - for those who missed it the first time around...


TALK SHOW

Interviewer: "Why did you start conducting, Maestro?"

Maestro:      "Well, Bob, I just LOVE to beat! I'd do it all day if I could. Beating, that's why I got into it; that's what turns me on about conducting. That and the money."

Interviewer: "What else do you like about conducting?"

Maestro:      "Well, Bob, when I am not beating, I really like to talk to the orchestra, you know, explain things."

Interviewer: "Like what, Maestro?"

Maestro:       "I like to tell them how great a piece is, and how much Beethoven has meant to me personally. Then I especially like to tell them when something sounds really bad. And then I like to have them do the passage over and over again. With my beat. Did I tell you, Bob, how much I like to beat?" 

…and now this, live from Tianjin!

The report from a masterclass I did Friday night in Tianjin, at the playhouse of the Grand Theater.  Mozart and Verdi Requiems.  I guess I said something about driving a bus…and apparently I need to lose a few. Best to all. - MG


马克·吉普森:指挥就像开公交

2015-12-12 天津大剧院

作一个指挥家到底是一种怎样的体验?那个一直对大家指指点点的小棒子究竟有什么作用?你或许从来不知道乐队指挥与合唱指挥有多大的差别,你或许从来不知道,指挥在把控演奏和演唱的同时还需多么细心地注意自己的手势不要影响乐手或歌手的身体状态……昨天,指挥大师马克·吉普森在天津大剧院的指挥大师课上,就这些问题一一给出了形象生动的解答和展示。



只把拍子挥出来,那不是音乐,在我看来也不是指挥,你要让乐队知道你想要的是什么音乐。老师要传达的,和学生理解的总是有偏差,我要做的,就是让学生能听懂我想要指导的内容。做指挥很像做公交车司机,乐手们就像乘客,我要让他们舒适的享受“旅程”。
——马克·吉普森




昨晚的公开课,由马克·吉普森、天津音乐学院作曲系主任卢长剑、天津大学的北洋合唱团的同学以及指导老师温雨川、天津音乐学院指挥专业学生陈昊明共同完成,马克先生分别用了莫扎特和威尔第的安魂曲作为展示内容,重点强调了指挥家与合唱团的真正交流,不仅需要手势传递语言,并且需要透过眼神传递感情和信息。

合唱指挥的手势应该尽量的低,活动的范围也应该尽量的小,因为当你的手抬高时,歌手的喉头也会跟着提高,这会影响到他们的气息与发声。除了手势,我还可以用我的呼吸、我的眼神向他们传递我对音乐的把控。






如何学习成为一名指挥
吉普森教授给出了自己的答案:“首先要热爱音乐,然后要学习音乐,学习演奏,多看乐谱,少听录音,当然这是我自己的理解。”









微信号:tjgrandtheatre 微博:@天津大剧院

订票电话
022-83882000 83882008
4000567790 8008187790

点击阅读原文可直接登录官网

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Who's afraid of Herodias?

Dear Readers,

So why should it be so difficult just to study Salome?  Sometimes, I can barely bring myself to pick it up, much less open it.  And yet, in spite of its immensity, at least of its orchestral scope, it is just the same 12 notes.  Same twelve notes as in Bach, as in Mozart, as in Schoenberg, Debussy and Brahms.  Different order, different level of density, but ultimately, just 12 pitches in various patterns and forms of organization.  Is the conducting difficult?  Not really - it is 1, 2, 3, 4 and occasionally 5/4.  Phrase structure?  Mostly 4-bar phrases.  Deep dramatic issues?  Not so much - girl meets guy, tries to get to know him, guy turns girl down, she has his head chopped off.  Mixed marriages - you know, they never work.  A lot of talk about the moon.  Oh, and there are some Jews yammering about; we had similar discussions when I was at Temple Israel in Minneapolis.

So what is the problem?  Well, they may only be the same 12 notes, but there are SO DARN MANY OF THEM!  Kind of makes me miss Arvo Pärt.  That, and anticipating the problems of rehearsing it  (you think it is hard to play on the piano? Take a gander at the 1st violin part) and preparing for the balance issues of concert performance when the orchestra is on stage.

I think it is crucial - just as we ought never underestimate the complexity of a Mozart piano concerto - not to overestimate the challenges of a big Strauss score.  It's like how you go about eating a 3-lb. porterhouse - one bite at a time, and what you don't eat now, take home and have tomorrow.  I have found it helpful to open up the score on any given day somewhere in the middle, or towards the end, and sometimes to work backwards.  This helps me get a larger view of the work, and to look at mastering the score in pieces rather than as a marathon from the first page to the last.  Above all, DON'T PANIC.  It will all get learned, if you - or rather, I - keep at it.

And don't skip steps, tempting though it may be.  I'm currently writing the text in the margins of my piano score (yes, I'm working out of a piano score first, then will address the instrumentation and traffic - only one anxiety attack at a time, please).  Speaking text, speaking text in rhythm, repeating text.  I think of it like grinding the ink for my sumi-e paintings; just keep gently grinding the stone, over and over again.

I'm pretty much through these first two parts of my process, and have started singing it (yes, it's already translated; the more German you do, the more German you know!).  I sit down and play the score more for pleasure than for understanding at this point.  Still haven't sat down with a recording, and I'm not sure I will.  It is a luxury to have the time to do this; nothing worse than cramming a score down my mental gullet.

There comes a point, after the dread, the laziness, the fatigue, when it becomes fun.  Pleasurable.  I'm starting to get to that point; the point where the notes don't seem quite as small, the harmonies not quite as thorny, the words not so tongue-twisting.  Where the drama emerges as a panorama of possibility, not imperative.   Just keep going.  Chop wood, carry water.  Or in this case, chop head, carry..uh...torches.

Best to all from Beijing,
MG

Monday, December 7, 2015

AQI 365 - "Hazardous" and other niceties of Beijing

Dear Friends,

That is what the air quality index was in Beijing at 6:00 am this morning.  We are all wearing masks today.  And yet, in spite of the bad air, it is good to be back here.  I'll be working with 17 aspiring, eager conductors this week at Central Conservatory, and probably another two dozen next week at China Conservatory, on the north side of town.  Sandwiched in between is a masterclass at the Tianjin Grand Theater (look it up, it's pretty grand!) on Mozart and Verdi Requiems (a few conductors, w. chorus and piano) this Friday.

It was a busy fall, as many of you know, with highs and lows. The Philharmonia performed everything from Mondonville to Carousel, Schoenberg to Rachmaninoff, Bach to Madama Butterfly.  Along the way was an Elgar 1 (I still believe in the piece, even though we didn't really do justice to this incredibly difficult score) and Mahler 7 (great perf. led by my friend and colleague, Ulrich Nicolai!).

On my desk now is Salome, but even she must await the conclusion of The Beat Stops Here, which is due to Oxford on Jan. 15.  Eek!  Just around the corner.  Most of the writing is done; there is still a lengthy chapter on conducting Des knaben Wunderhorn.  I have to finish up a few chapters (last mvmt, Scheherazade, very ending of Dvorak Scherzo Capriccioso, Brahms Tragic Overture, Manon/DesGrieux duet) and the metronome chapter.  Then proofing, back material, front material and the daily prayers offered up to the publishing gods/goddesses.

In the course of a lot of thinking about conducting, I do want to iterate a few basics, if you don't mind:
1)  One is down, usually ;-)
2)  Cross on two, at least sometimes ;-)
3)  "The orchestra has the right to expect that the conductor knows the score at least as well as they do." - Herbert Blomstedt
4)  Protocols for opera study: a) write out text, b) speak text, c) translate text, d) sing text
5)  Going from a long note value from a short note value requires…say it with me…"an EXTRA PIECE OF INFORMATION."
6)  Once you rebound vertically, you lose any influence on sound.  Stay off of the trampoline!
7)  Establish PULSE, then surf the sound!

Will try to write every day that I am here; there is much I want to share about our craft and our "horrendous profession."  Take care, and best wishes for the holidays.  Now to find that darn mask…

MG

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Mick Jagger sighting in Venice Beach!

Friends,

OK, this has NOTHING to do with conducting, but while at an airbnb in Venice Beach with my daughter (I have been here for the weekend, judging the Met Opera district auditions), our host shared selflies from 2 weeks ago of her and MJ in Miami.  He's 72 and still rockin'…and smokin' hot.  This emerged out of a discussion about the wear and tear of travel on my poor old frame.  Apparently Mick has no such concerns; of course it helps if you fly 1st class and have the penthouse view of South Beach.

Not that I am at all complaining.  Paula and I strolled the boardwalk up and down to Santa Monica pier, checked out "Muscle Beach" (yes, it really exists), ate a fab glam lunch at Gjelina (so hip, its name is nowhere to be found on the building), a super cool glam breakfast at its cousin, Gjusta (again, no name), and…(gulp!)…a vegan dinner at a place called "Cafe Gratitude."  Uh-huh.  V-E-G-A-N.  Veggie tostadas (called "Yo soy felix"), quinoa pasta shells ("Bountiful") with cherry tomatoes, eggplant and basil-hempseed pesto, all organic.  FELT SO VIRTUOUS.  Of course that all went to hell last night with a badass burger at the Blue Cow, up here on Grand, near the Biltmore Hotel.  There is only so much healthy grub this man can take.

Oh, the auditions.  My first time judging in LA in about 12 years, I think.  Very well organized, and some good talent.  We heard some fine singing and sent 4 people (2 sops, 1 mezzo and a young tenor) to the regionals in two weeks.  Goodness, I love hearing gifted singers!  Judged with Michael Egel, General Director of Des Moines Metro Opera, and the wonderful mezzo, Luretta Bybee; we made a great team.  

Back to Cinti on the red-eye tonight, then on the podium for Dvorak New World tomorrow.  It turns out to be a pretty good piece of music.  Reviewing the score, I find…
..WAIT!  This post is supposed to have NOTHING to do with conducting!  More later…but before I sign off, I should point out the all of the plates at Cafe Grat had on them, "What are you grateful for today?"  Sigh and smile.  Enjoy your Sunday.  Back to work tomorrow!
- MG

Sunday, September 27, 2015

"Monumental" Grieg

Who would have thought it possible?  Last night at the Dayton Philharmonic, soloist Emile Naoumoff transformed the sweet little Grieg concerto, that mainstay of my youth, from student competition piece - or at best, the "big brother" of the Schumann - to "THE GREATEST CONCERTO EVER WRITTEN," in a performance shockingly over the top, beyond committed, so far out on the limb that they had to build new limb, legendary and unforgettable.  My daughter, for whom classical music ranks  marginally above Mantovani and somewhere below dissecting frogs, was literally in tears throughout much of it.  I found myself swearing out loud, "Holy f___! WHAT WAS THAT?!?!" while yelling "Bravo!" at the conclusion.  The performance made the Tchaikovsky 5 on the second half seem like an afterthought, however well-executed it was.

I was reminded of Mr. Bernstein, who urged us onward at Tanglewood with the thought that "Any sound is possible," and of my own piano teacher, Ted Lettvin, who insisted, "Make a sound I've never heard before."  One might have found Mr. Naoumoff's physical histrionics unconvincing and on the wrong side of good taste, but I bought into the whole approach within the first 5 minutes.  It wasn't flashy, hand-wise; it wasn't fast (good Lord, it was the antithesis of fast!), it was hyper-dramatic - again, perhaps not everyone's cup of tea - but he sold it, clearly believed in it and I found it irresistible.  I became a believer again, not just in the piece itself, but in the possibility that one who has been attending concerts for 55 years from NY to Beijing and back, could still be surprised, delighted and awed.  By frikkin' Grieg, of all things.  In Dayton.

To describe the performance further would be to diminish it, so I'll leave it at that.  I hope to bring some of that crazy to Elgar this week, even though "Elgar" and "crazy" might seem incompatible notions.  They aren't, as we discovered in rehearsal on the 1st Symphony this past week.  Some of the writing is crazy hard, the music crazy beautiful, the architecture crazy aspirational.  We're going to go for it.  If Naoumoff + Grieg + Dayton can = WOW, Philharmonia + Elgar + CCM can at least aim in that direction.

Party on! - MG

Monday, September 21, 2015

Needs and wants

Dear Readers,

While our orchestral Bill of Rights has been around a while, discussion arose last week in class about orchestral needs and wants as they pertain directly to our conducting.  Here are the questions I posed:

What conducting does the orchestra NEED?
What conducting does the orchestra WANT?
And what conducting do we do because we think it's cool?"

Please take a day or two to consider,  then I'll share with you the ideas we assembled.  I hope you will consider this a discussion, not a test or a statement of dogma.  I just think it is an interesting concept, and we came up with specific responses from both the class and our string quartet "orchestrina."  NOTE:  No violists were harmed in the writing of this post.

Regards to all.  Elgar sends his best.
MG

Friday, September 18, 2015

Land of Hope and Glory…and half-diminished 7th chords

No, dear readers, I have not forgotten about you.  I have been lost in Elgarland, trying to understand this 1st symphony.  Today's blogpost is from the note I just wrote for the Philharmonia, as we prepare to tackle this massive work next week:

"Elgar's language is ripe with half-diminished 7th chords and German +6 chords.  Extreme chromaticism is mixed with "noble" diatonic passages in ways which I find most challenging to understand.   Influences range from Wagner to Strauss to Brahms (compare the last mvmts of Elgar 1 and Brahms 3).  I think of the pressure on Elgar to produce an important "British" symphony, how long it took him to write one; he was actually older than Brahms was when he wrote his own 1st symphony.  Among many fascinating aspects of the work, I am finding the implications of half-diminished 7th's and how they distort and expand the architectural/harmonic design of sonata-allegro form especially compelling.  That may sound like a pretty obscure path to wander down, but it is one which I find important to travel in order to grasp Elgar's design, especially in the sprawling 1st movement.

At times I wish all music were as immediately effective as Act 1 duet from Madama Butterfly (even though it was cut and pasted together in an effort to create a convincing dramatic/lyric narrative), or as compactly constructed and direct in impact as Dvorak 9.  But it isn't, and the expansion of post-Wagnerian chromatic vocabulary altered symphonic design irrevocably.  Rachmaninoff tried the symphonic form 3 times, and only succeeded in the 2nd (in my opinion).  Elgar waited till he was 50, and built an extraordinary work of great power and beauty, but his language takes more effort to understand.  I hope you will find it worth the effort."

I have a lot more to say about the half-dim 7th chord thing, but not now.  Now it is time to congratulate my former student JUNGHYUN CHO for winning the Blue Danube International Opera Conducting Competition - WOO-HOO!!!  No one is more deserving; am so proud of him and happy for him.

Have a great weekend! - MG



Saturday, September 12, 2015

Luisi, Brahms, China Philharmonic

Memo to:     TBSH'ers
From:          Johannes Brahms
In re:           China Philharmonic/Fabio Luisi performance of my 2nd Symphony, in D Major, Op. 73

Last night, I was stirred from my grave (note - didn't roll over in my grave, not until the last movement) by a rousing performance of my 2nd symphony.  The playing was energetic and committed (most of it), even if the wind/brass intonation was at times, "ripe."  Maestro Luisi conducted from memory (he knows my score very well); he is an elegant looking man with great hair - no beard, but I won't hold that against him.  His view of my music was interesting; I used the word "rousing" above, but I don't really know if that was my intent in this work.  Some have referred to my 2nd Symphony as my "Pastoral."  I don't know if it is that, either.

I am always grateful when someone decides to perform my music in public, even though I am usually nervous about what they will do with it.  As I am no longer very energetic, nor was I when I wrote the piece, it is difficult for me to reconcile Mo. Luisi's athletic physical approach to my music with my own girth and gait, or at least that of my former self.

"Interpretation" aside (Mein Gott, how I hate that word!), the intonation truly suffered the longer the performance went on.  Main culprits were the 3 and 4 horns (und warum immer so stark?), oboe, clarinet and trombones.  The matching of pitch was acutely off in the 2nd movement, and Mo. did nothing to address the concern.

That said, there was a lot of beautiful playing.  Don't understand why the 1st violins didn't all use the same fingering, and there were some indiscriminate slides - schöne - but not uniformly executed.  Great principal violist; I want him for my new "Dead Philharmonic"  (by the way, if anyone wants to help fund it, I can get you in now on the underground floor...).

This, from our "DEAD CRITICS ARCHIVES."

Enjoy the weekend; now I go back to work on Elgar 1, which is a heckuva of a piece.  More on that later, friends.  - MG

Friday, September 11, 2015

From "Scout" to "Trail"

Dear Readers,

Happy Friday!   A word puzzle for you today; what we call "word ladders."  We will start with an easy one:  How do you get from the word "DOG" to the word "CAT," changing just one letter at a time?  How many ladder "rungs" do you need?  An easy one - just three.  Now a complicated one, which seems like it should be easier than it turned out to be (thanks, John Murton, for the solution!):  How many rungs does it take to get from "SCOUT" to "TRAIL"?  While you ponder that one, here is the point…


…which revolves around Rachmaninoff 2nd Symphony.  While one might think that Rachmaninoff just sucked that ravishing tune in the 3rd movement (the clarinet tune, not the dozen other ravishing tunes) out of thin air, I can easily make the case that the tune was derived, if not constructed, from other material in the symphony.  So here is a note puzzle, based on the same concept as the word ladder:  How does Rachmaninoff get from bar 1 of the 1st movement to bar 6 of the 3rd?  How many musical/note "rungs" does he employ?  How many does he need?  Does this teach us anything about how he composed in general?  Are there other works in which he uses a similar approach to melodic generation through motivic expansion?


…ok, here's a hint about SCOUT to TRAIL - 14 rungs.

Have a great weekend, and keep a score nearby! - MG 

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Why the 3rd mvmt of Fantastique is great...

Dear Readers,

Happy Thursday!  

We are working on Symphonie Fantastique (among other pieces) this semester in conducting class and the question came up about the 3rd movement - boring, or not boring?  Several members of the class were rather forthright about their feelings, and another member defended the movement, saying that she liked it a lot.  My assignment to her - give a talk on what you like about the 3rd mvmt of Fantastique.

Before weighing in further, I should add that I didn't like Fantastique at all for many years, not until I conducted it, in fact.  Furthermore, I didn't really get Berlioz style until working on and conducting Les Nuits d'Étés, Harold in Italy and Roméo.  Now even though I very much enjoy a lot of Berlioz, Fantastique is by no means my favorite of his works.  That said, I am especially fond of the 3rd movement.  Hmm…

So what do you think?  How do you feel about the 3rd movement?  And why?  I am interested in responses and opinions, and then I will be happy to share mine.

More to come.  Happy score study! - MG

Thursday, September 3, 2015

"MAKE YOUR OWN METRONOME!"

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

It is a pleasure to report that I have a new homework assignment, from Oxford University Press, related to their acceptance of "The Beat Stops Here" for publication (yay!).  My task - to restart the TBSH blog and to share it with as many people as possible.  Given that I am not on social media, I hope you will take the opportunity to spread word about the blog with your friends and colleagues, and together, we can make empty, dumb beating a thing of the past.  We can cure podium deafness, one maestro at a time.  We can solve the problem of tempo illiteracy and wasted rehearsal time, if we do it together.

Public service announcement over.  I thought you might find this fun; it is from a new piece, about tempo.  I shared it with my students at opera bootcamp this summer and with my current class - hope you enjoy!  By the way, next CCM orch conducting workshop is next April 22-24, 2016: Conducting Rachmaninoff and Sibelius 2nd Symphonies.  Woo-hoo!  Can't wait.

MAKE YOUR OWN METRONOME!
An Interactive Arts and Crafts Project
I: FIRST, A TEST!
1) Do you like music?
2) Are you good at math?
3) If not, do you have a calculator?
4) Do you like scavenger hunts?
If you answered yes to at least three of the questions above, you passed the test and you can start to MAKE YOUR OWN METRONOME!  All you need are a few items you already have around your house or studio.  First you need some scores, then you need a pencil and paper, and a calculator (if you are not good at math).

II:  GATHER YOUR TOOLS!
Scores you will need - all of the Beethoven symphonies, especially the Scherzos.
Other scores you may use – Tchaikovsky 5 and 6, Carmen, Petrouchka, and/or any other scores you want that have metronome markings.  Gather your scores, pencil, paper (and calculator, if you are not good at math) in one place; you are now ready for the next step in MAKING YOUR OWN METRONOME!


III:  SCAVENGER HUNT!
Below you can see a list of numbers. All you have to do is hunt through the scores in front of you for pieces of music - either entire pieces or parts of pieces - that match the numbers below.  You may need more scores, so get some if you need them.  Ready?  OK, let’s go!
Metronome marking Piece #1 Piece #2 Piece #3
40
48
52
56
58
60
63
66
69
72
76
80
84
88
90
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
126
132
138
144
152
160
168
176
Now you may be thinking, “Boy, that is an awful lot of numbers!”  You are right, Maestro, it is!  That’s ok; you are smart.  If everyone could do it, the world would be filled with conductors, and aren’t we glad that it isn’t?  So start hunting for those numbers, take all the time you want, look through all the scores you need.  Here, I’ve given you a head start; below you can find a list of the metronome markings Beethoven himself assigned to the Scherzos of eight of his nine symphonies.  Why not all nine, you may ask?  Silly Maestro!  You must know that the 8th Symphony doesn’t have a Scherzo, silly!  Wasn’t that silly!  Isn’t this fun?
You may now be asking yourself, “But wait, what about all the numbers in between, like 41, or 65, or 113, or 147?  Why don’t we have to find THOSE numbers?”  OK, here is a secret, but don’t tell ANYONE – those numbers really don’t exist on a metronome.  No REAL composer uses them. You may see them in some pieces of music and even on some of those metronomes you find online, but most composers don’t use them, at least not GREAT composers.  All right, maybe Bartok, but he doesn’t count; he was Hungarian.  No, you really only need the ones listed above.
Another question?  OK, what is it?  “If I find a piece at 60, why do I have to find a different piece at 120?  Isn’t that just twice as fast?”  You are RIGHT, Maestro, you really only need to find pieces that are divisible into another number!  The same is true with 126, or 144, which are divisible both by 2 (63 and 72) and by 3 (42 and 48).  Now you are really getting the hang of it!
HERE IS YOUR BONUS STARTER LIST OF PIECES WITH NUMBERS!
Metronome Markings of the Scherzos from Beethoven Symphonies,
from slowest to fastest:
Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67 dotted half = 96
Symphony No. 2 in D Major, Op. 36 dotted half = 100
Symphony No. 4 in B-Flat Major, Op. 60 dotted half = 100, Trio: 88
Symphony No. 1 in C Major, Op. 21* dotted half = 108
Symphony No. 6 in F Major, Op. 68 dotted half = 108
Symphony No. 3 in E-Flat Major, Op. 55, “Eroica” dotted half = 116
Symphony No. 9 in D Minor, Op. 125 (2nd mvmt) dotted half = 116
Symphony No. 7 in A Major, Op. 92 dotted half = 132, Trio: 84
* - 3rd movement marked “Menuetto”
Note:  Symphony No. 8 in F Major, Op. 93 has no Scherzo.  3rd movement Menuetto is at 126.

Wow!  That’s 8 different numbers already, and if you divide them in half, why, that’s 16 numbers.  See how much fun it is!  Now for the MOST IMPORTANT PART of MAKING YOUR OWN METRONOME!!  Are you ready?  Here it is:

IV: CHARGING YOUR NEW METRONOME!

Once you have as much of the chart filled in as you can (and you can keep adding to the chart as much as you want), you will be able to say
I MADE MY OWN METRONOME!
But the metronome WON’T WORK until you put in a battery.  Your metronome doesn’t take normal batteries, because it doesn’t run on electricity.  No, your new metronome runs on a “BRAIN BATTERY.”  All you have to do to charge your brain battery is to STUDY SCORES.  Learn the pieces you yourself found that correspond to the numbers in the chart you made all by yourself, so you know exactly how they sound and how fast they go.  The more you learn, the more powerful your brain battery will be and the longer it will last.  You may ask now, “Won’t that take a long time?”  The answer is YES - it will a long time.  It will take years.  So you had better get to work, Maestro.
You might now ask, “Now that I have my own NEW METRONOME, what can I do with it?  What is it good for?”  These are excellent questions:  Think about this:

V: USES FOR YOUR NEW METRONOME!
Now that you have your own new metronome and charged it with your brain battery, there are several useful and fun things you can do with it.  First, you can use it to find a right tempo, or the right tempo, of any other piece that has a metronome marking. Suppose you come a piece of music that you haven’t studied, and it has a metronome marking at the beginning.  Maybe you are looking at the aria known as “Musetta’s Waltz,” from act two of Puccini’s opera, La bohème.  It is written at 96 to the quarter note.  Take your metronome, go to the line that says “96” and you will find the Scherzo from Beethoven 5.  Everybody knows how this one goes!  Just sing; sing just the horn call: “Sol – sol – sol – so-o-o-l, sol – sol – sol – so-o-o-l,” etc.  And now you know the tempo for Musetta’s Waltz, at least as written by Puccini.
I know what you are going to say now.  You will say now (I already know!) that you have heard this Puccini song, and that it went much slower than that.
Right.  We said that your new metronome can be used to find a right tempo.  Many pieces of music have different “right” tempos, depending on who is playing or singing them.  Yes, Maestro, there is more than one “right” tempo for some pieces of music; in fact probably for all pieces of music.  Don’t confuse your NEW METRONOME with another toy, like the “Magic 8-Ball,” which knows ALL the right answers, if not the right tempos.  Your NEW METRONOME doesn’t have all the right tempos; it has all the tempos you need, but only you can decide if they are right or not.  But here is the neat thing about your NEW METRONOME – at least you don’t have to guess anymore what all those confusing numbers mean and how fast or slow they are.  Isn’t that neat?  So much fun!

More to come friends.  Rock 'n' roll! - MG