In rehearsal on Brahms last week, ensemble disintegrated at one point. The concertmaster, who is wonderful, immediately turned to her section and urged them to watch me. I didn't mean to contradict her, but I suggested precisely the opposite, "No, let's try it again; do it without me." I didn't beat at all, and as usual in any repertoire this side of Le Sacre du Printemps, it worked just fine. The solution wasn't to watch the conductor; it was for the musicians to be more connected with each other.
This anecdote does beg several questions, which I raise from time to time with my students, and that is the subject of today's quiz:
1) How many musicians are actually looking at us at any given time?
2) What percentage of the time are they looking at us?
3) How often do we want/expect them to be looking at us?
4) How often do they really need to look at us?
5) What part of us exactly are they supposed to be looking at? The tip of the stick? Our face? The turn of our left hand?
6) Why after all do we want, need or expect the orchestra to look at us?
Before jumping all over that one, think carefully, and consider the next question:
7) How much of the orchestra do we actually look at when we conduct, how often, and why?
Many other factors to take into account: Is it a rehearsal or a concert? If a rehearsal, is it a rehearsal to fix "mechanics," or to establish geist and flow? Are we seeking to "inspire" the group? If it is a concert, do our expectations change (does the orchestra's?), and if so, how? My colleague, Imre Pallo, once told me that he didn't like to rehearse too much. That way, he said, he knew the orchestra would be looking at him during the concert. Well, there’s a tradeoff:
8) Would you give up rehearsal time if you knew the orchestra would pay more attention to you in performance?
I don't mean to overwhelm with questions; the point is that the concept of "looking" is far more nuanced and complex than it first appears. Think of the layers of interpersonal and technical complexity involved in the perennial (and loaded) question:
Bonus question:
9) "Where do you want us/are we supposed to play on your beat?"
God, don't you hate it when they ask us that! It is usually preceded by a loss of pulse and ragged ensemble after the group is already frustrated either with themselves or with Maestro, invariably delivered with a soupçon of 'tude. Of course, it's a trick question, to which there is no single satisfactory answer. But that is to be addressed in another bar, on another sunny day.
In closing, if you really want to orchestra to look at you, to hang on your every word and gesture, consider becoming its personnel manager.
Possible Answers:
1) All of them some of the time; none of them all of the time.
2) Depends on many factors, from who is playing to what they are playing to where they are sitting.
3) Consider this: Have you ever looked at the 1st violin part of Don Juan, much less tried to play it?
4) My rule: The orchestra will be happy to look at us if we give them something worthwhile to look at.
5) Good question, think about it: How much of us can an orchestra member actually focus on, spatially, between the music on their stand, our two hands (usually parallel, separated and away from our bodies), the stick in one of them and our face, while actually playing an instrument?
6) Your wants mean nothing, “need” is a big word and expectations will break your heart every time.
7) Physician, heal thyself.
8) Well, would you?
9) A little like the lawyer who asks you, “Have you stopped beating your wife?”
Back to work!
No one but Mark knows who I am. Let's just say I play a large instrument that can easily turn to splinters if your efforts to get the thing through a door are unsuccessful. And I've been doing this for 30 years. In reasonably good
ReplyDeleteorchestras. Some of them at CCM. Anyway. Answers....
1) What am I playing? If it's the last movement of Haffner, then I'm probably looking at you. Or the concertmaster. Or the principal oboe's legs. I've had that movement memorized since I was 15. You have to prove to me that you know something about this movement that I don't....because trust me on this one, I've studied it a lot more than you. IF you successfully do so, you have my full attention for the rest of the week.
2) Percentage? Again, what am I playing? If it's that Lay Sacree Do Printers thing that you mentioned above, then I'm probably looking at you a lot. I'm not starting deeply into your eyes, but believe me, your stick is in my peripheral vision at all times. If it's Brahms 1, then I may be looking at you, but I'm really thinking about what I'm going to have for lunch. This excludes the B Major (F# Major, D Major, Gb Major, yadayada....) section in Mvt III, in which case my eyes are glued to you for about one bar.
3, 4, 5, Maybe 6) Let's face it, all of us (meaning conductors, orchestral musicians, librarians, stage hands) are narcissistic to a certain degree. I mean, if I just NAILED a passage in Bruckner 5 (yeah, THAT passage) then I want everyone in the audience to be throwing roses in my direction. Does it or will it ever happen like it does in my dreams? Lord, I hope not. So what about you, Mr/Ms Conductor? Are you expecting us to be looking at you constantly?
Or only when you make a subtle gesture that tells us that sometime soon you are going to do something brilliant? I can tell you that I have literally stared at conductors for entire movements (see Haffner, above) and gotten either NO reaction or we have developed a bond that is stronger than family. I don't want EITHER of those things. I was just playing with you, seeing how you would react. And....
Usually, believe it or, you are intimidated. And I think that's hilarious. Because, after all, how can you express how brilliant you are when one (or more) of the players literally have most of a piece memorized and are just staring
at you to see if you would fidget? Aren't we supposed to have our heads buried in our stands, rosin flying about only slightly less than the sweat of our forehead and we are supposed to look to you for guidance as we sweat and rosin
our way through this highly difficult thing called Brahms. Well, right? You ARE the leader, right? Isn't it you who drops the stick and magic happens?
So, how often DO we need to look at you so that you can bestow upon us your magic? Maestro Gibson has a point...have you had a look at the Vln I part to Don Juan? How about this: Name five double bass excerpts (Recit from 9 doesn't
count.) Bassoon? Flute ("Faun" doesn't count?) Viola? Have you SEEN the stuff we have to play?
So THIS is when I look at you: WHEN I REALLY NEED YOU. And guess what? Half the time you're not there for me. It's not your fault, you didn't know it was hard and THIS is the spot when I'm going to need help. And why did you not know that? Oh yeah, name five double bass excerpts. ANYBODY get the point yet?
What part of you am I looking at? I apologize, because you are going to hate this. But it's true. My section was having a hard time with a guest conductor. Keep in mind, double basses are usually the instrument that has a "pizz
ReplyDeleteout of nowhere" and, as such, I (and my section) needs to develop some kind of relationship with the conductor so we know where on earth to put it. (Because trust me, if you don't show me, I'm gonna put it where I think it goes. Most
of the time I'm right.) Anyway, this just wasn't working. Until I realized that the very tip of the stick contained ALL of the information. I passed this on to my section and, viola, we were now able to communicate with this person's stick. Now this doesn't answer everything about question 5, but it does tell a story doesn't it?
And on to 6. You need to have your ego fed just like we do. Narcissistic, remember? But more to the point, if we are looking at you, then you have the feeling that we are buying into whatever interpretation of whatever piece we showed up to play today. You feel edified and empowered that a group as experienced as this is enjoying the fact that all of your study and scholarship paid off. That might actually be true. We might also be looking at you because your fly is unzipped.
7) I'll leave that one to you conductors.
For that matter, I think I will leave 8 to the conducting community as well. Because giving up rehearsal time is a double-edged blade. Are you letting us out early, for instance, to garner favor with the ensemble? If so, we don't care about a couple minutes here or there. Thirty minutes, yes. Three minutes, well, look....we appreciate the gesture but keep in mind we've been doing gymnastics under our chin for over two hours...we're kind of used to it. Now if you mean "...purposely under-rehearsing a piece so that we will pay more attention to you at the
performance?..." Wrong. Very wrong. We're not going to pay more attention to YOU at the performance, we're going to pay more attention to our PARTS. Which means we're not looking at you. So whatever you meant to do with that piece you can now forget about, because we are going to play it how we play it....regardless of who is conducting this week.
9) I LIKE this question. Take some comfort that more experienced orchestras are less likely to ask that question out loud, but it does happen. And when it does, what you should do is this:
You should explain to the ensemble why you feel as though you have a divine connection with Brahms/Beethoven/Debussy and Lenny was just plain wrong when he added a crescendo in measure xxx of Mvt I of Bruckner 4. Why just last week
you were having lunch with MTT in San Francisco and he reminded you that he believes not only does Ravel have a misprint in bar xxx of La Valse but he intends to go to the key of Ab before returning to D major as the Neapolitan
suggests....
When the orchestra awakes, they will love you. Trust me.
Beethoven 5, iii
ReplyDeleteMozart 40, i
Otello, Act 4
Mozart 35, iv
Stravinsky Pulcinella
I got more, if you want 'em.
Thanks for the detailed response, Will!