Friends,
My sabbatical so far has seemed like a game of Monopoly, one which cannot begin until money is accurately counted and distributed, deeds are meticulously arranged by color, Community Chest and Chance cards are thoroughly shuffled and placed in their appropriate spaces on the board, the money is tucked carefully in discreet stacks on my side of the board, and a token is chosen after laboriously consideration (... the iron, the car, the hat??...). In short, bogged down in "stuff."
There has also been study. Bruckner 8 turns out to be a remarkable score (I know, BIG SURPRISE, right?). One is caught between trying to conceive of the sonic landscape from the page itself - a little like picturing the terrain of Nepal from a two-dimensional map - and listening to a recording of the work, which is intimidating on the one hand and deceptive on the other. I suggest to my students that, while preparing a particular work of one composer, one must study other works of that composer; never have I felt that more the case than for Bruckner. So thankful that I had the honor of conducting the 7th Symphony two years ago and have done the 4th as well. That said, it helps to have heard some of the others, 3, 5, 6 and 9.
A lot of my study, aside from the usual phrase and harmonic analysis and orchestration, has been about perceiving the geist, trying to grasp Bruckner's emotional and spiritual intent. From a gestural standpoint, I won't want to get bogged down in micromanaging attacks, entrances and cutoffs; I need to trust the Philharmonia to execute - "A great orchestra takes care of its own business." I start to understand Karajan's physical approach, though I don't want to imitate him. Essentially, I need to immerse myself more in this score, in this man, in this Church, this cathedral of sound, and trust that when the time comes, on the podium, a physical approach will be revealed to me.
I have heard the piece live twice, once decades ago with Tennstedt and the Minnesota Orchestra in a performance that left me speechless, literally unable even to applaud, and two years ago with Paavo Jarvi and the Cincinnati Symphony, a performance that was sonically impressive but failed to move me as Tennstedt's did. That doesn't necessarily mean that it was less "good" - there is much to be written about how and why we are affected, as audience members, by this or that performance, but that is another discussion.
About the Scherzo - I admit that I don't grasp the Trio and can only hope that I will get a better understanding of it through further study. Bruckner's insistence on maintaining the formal structure of a traditional symphony while expanding its spiritual horizons is fascinating to me. Sonata-allegro form is, as I see it, more conducive to the transformational aspect of his musical ideas. Still, one must accept the whole, and revel in Bruckner's capacity to transcend beyond the architecture
Enough talking about the piece, time to dive back in to the score. Thank you for allowing me to share randomness. The road to mastery, as I have said often, is not a straight line. It is circuitous, but both the journey itself and the destination are fulfilling beyond words.
And what are YOU studying today? Where is your musical journey taking you?
- Mark Gibson
My sabbatical so far has seemed like a game of Monopoly, one which cannot begin until money is accurately counted and distributed, deeds are meticulously arranged by color, Community Chest and Chance cards are thoroughly shuffled and placed in their appropriate spaces on the board, the money is tucked carefully in discreet stacks on my side of the board, and a token is chosen after laboriously consideration (... the iron, the car, the hat??...). In short, bogged down in "stuff."
There has also been study. Bruckner 8 turns out to be a remarkable score (I know, BIG SURPRISE, right?). One is caught between trying to conceive of the sonic landscape from the page itself - a little like picturing the terrain of Nepal from a two-dimensional map - and listening to a recording of the work, which is intimidating on the one hand and deceptive on the other. I suggest to my students that, while preparing a particular work of one composer, one must study other works of that composer; never have I felt that more the case than for Bruckner. So thankful that I had the honor of conducting the 7th Symphony two years ago and have done the 4th as well. That said, it helps to have heard some of the others, 3, 5, 6 and 9.
A lot of my study, aside from the usual phrase and harmonic analysis and orchestration, has been about perceiving the geist, trying to grasp Bruckner's emotional and spiritual intent. From a gestural standpoint, I won't want to get bogged down in micromanaging attacks, entrances and cutoffs; I need to trust the Philharmonia to execute - "A great orchestra takes care of its own business." I start to understand Karajan's physical approach, though I don't want to imitate him. Essentially, I need to immerse myself more in this score, in this man, in this Church, this cathedral of sound, and trust that when the time comes, on the podium, a physical approach will be revealed to me.
I have heard the piece live twice, once decades ago with Tennstedt and the Minnesota Orchestra in a performance that left me speechless, literally unable even to applaud, and two years ago with Paavo Jarvi and the Cincinnati Symphony, a performance that was sonically impressive but failed to move me as Tennstedt's did. That doesn't necessarily mean that it was less "good" - there is much to be written about how and why we are affected, as audience members, by this or that performance, but that is another discussion.
About the Scherzo - I admit that I don't grasp the Trio and can only hope that I will get a better understanding of it through further study. Bruckner's insistence on maintaining the formal structure of a traditional symphony while expanding its spiritual horizons is fascinating to me. Sonata-allegro form is, as I see it, more conducive to the transformational aspect of his musical ideas. Still, one must accept the whole, and revel in Bruckner's capacity to transcend beyond the architecture
Enough talking about the piece, time to dive back in to the score. Thank you for allowing me to share randomness. The road to mastery, as I have said often, is not a straight line. It is circuitous, but both the journey itself and the destination are fulfilling beyond words.
And what are YOU studying today? Where is your musical journey taking you?
- Mark Gibson